Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit
the main index
.
You can also
download the archives in mbox format
.
nmh-workers (date)
[
Thread Index
][
Top
][
All Lists
][
nmh-workers info page
]
Advanced
[
Prev Period
]
Last Modified: Thu Oct 23 2008 20:46:50 -0400
Messages in reverse chronological order
[
Next Period
]
October 23, 2008
'From ' lines (was Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1))
,
Joel Reicher
,
20:46
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Jeffrey C Honig
,
20:36
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
David Levine
,
14:49
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Jeffrey C Honig
,
14:41
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Peter Maydell
,
14:20
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Jon Steinhart
,
13:32
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
David Levine
,
12:52
October 22, 2008
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Jeffrey C Honig
,
23:40
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
David Levine
,
22:32
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Jeffrey C Honig
,
15:09
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Peter Maydell
,
12:50
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Jeffrey C Honig
,
12:09
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
bergman
,
11:27
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Peter Maydell
,
04:00
October 21, 2008
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
David Levine
,
16:53
[Nmh-workers] Re: big thanks
,
Justin Mason
,
12:51
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
bergman
,
10:50
Re: [Nmh-workers] utf-8 subject lines again
,
Peter Maydell
,
08:26
Re: [Nmh-workers] stealthily adding header lines?
,
Joel Reicher
,
07:54
[Nmh-workers] utf-8 subject lines again
,
rader
,
07:40
[Nmh-workers] big thanks
,
rader
,
07:12
[Nmh-workers] stealthily adding header lines?
,
rader
,
06:45
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
rader
,
06:39
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
Peter Maydell
,
03:20
October 20, 2008
Re: [Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
David Levine
,
22:11
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
Robert Elz
,
10:09
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
rader
,
07:03
October 19, 2008
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
rader
,
09:25
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
Jerry Peek
,
09:02
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
rader
,
00:18
October 18, 2008
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
Peter Maydell
,
20:38
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
rader
,
13:35
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
rader
,
10:59
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
Jerry Peek
,
10:16
[Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
,
rader
,
10:07
October 17, 2008
[Nmh-workers] 128 byte field name limit in NAMESZ breaks scan(1)
,
bergman
,
17:33
October 10, 2008
[Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 implementation
,
Luca Ottaviano
,
13:13
[
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc