[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_OBJEXT again
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: AC_OBJEXT again |
Date: |
08 Dec 2000 22:33:19 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
On Dec 7, 2000, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> "Morten" == Morten Eriksen <address@hidden> writes:
Morten> Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
>>> OBJEXT and EXEEXT [...] define precisely what they are (build, or
>>> host?), [...]
Morten> Just wanted to add my 0.02 Kroner: after pondering this issue
Morten> for a while, I tend to believe we should first and foremost
Morten> view them as characteristics of the _compiler_ -- screw
Morten> looking at the host and build system. :-)
> That's what I call a build characteristic.
Wrong. The compiler is supposed to follow conventions of the host,
not of the build machine.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/07
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Morten Eriksen, 2000/12/07
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/07
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Peter Eisentraut, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, akim, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/13