[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_OBJEXT again
From: |
Earnie Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: AC_OBJEXT again |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:01:36 -0800 (PST) |
--- Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> So the real question is, what happens when you use -o conftest? Will
> the cross-compiler and native Win compilers produce conftest, or/and
> conftest.exe? As long as conftest.exe is created when one `-o
> conftest', we're doing good.
>
AFAIKT, we're doing good. -o conftest will produce conftest.exe assuming we're
linking.
Cheers,
=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:address@hidden
--- <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com> ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/> ---
--- Minimalist GNU for Windows <http://www.mingw.org/> ---
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
- Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.), (continued)
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Lars J. Aas, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/12
- OBJ and EXE and cross-compilation (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: OBJ and EXE and cross-compilation (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Ralf Corsepius, 2000/12/12
- Re: OBJ and EXE and cross-compilation (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/12
- Re: OBJ and EXE and cross-compilation (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/13
Re: AC_OBJEXT again,
Earnie Boyd <=
RE: AC_OBJEXT again, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/12/13