[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) |
Date: |
14 Dec 2000 12:43:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <address@hidden> writes:
Mo> Beats me, looks like a bug in the compiler. It really should check
Mo> to see if there is a .exe extension on the -o argument and add one
Mo> if not found. But, since there is no way to rely on this being
Mo> fixed in autoconf, me thinks we need to check for the a.out or
Mo> a.exe. Is there going to be a problem with compilers other than
Mo> gcc? Do they also use a.out or a.exe as the default output name?
I plan to have the two tests: the a.exe one (in a conftestdir as was
to be suggested by Alexandre), and the -o conftest$ac_exeext one.
As for the other cross compilers, let them receive our signal: we are
setting a standard they have to follow :)
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), (continued)
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again),
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/15
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/15
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/15
- EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/15
- Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/15
- Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/15
- Re: EXEEXT: `cc -o' (Was: AC_CYGWIN etc.), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/16
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Lars J. Aas, 2000/12/14