[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More exit() troubles
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: More exit() troubles |
Date: |
19 Jan 2001 16:16:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <address@hidden> writes:
Lars> If you doubled the number of delarations, prefixing half of them
Lars> with __declspec(dllimport), the linkage setting might become
Lars> correct, but I really don't see why there's a need for the
Lars> declaration at all, or why people shouldn't have the option to
Lars> avoid the legacy exit prototype.
What do you mean? What you're suggesting is the best way to forget
about that macro, and use exit some day. If the price to pay is what
you suggest (__dlljunk), then let's go for it.
Can you show us the simplest program that *can* use exit on that
system?
- More exit() troubles, Lars J. Aas, 2001/01/18
- Re: More exit() troubles, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/18
- Re: More exit() troubles, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/18
- Re: More exit() troubles, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/18
- Re: More exit() troubles, Lars J. Aas, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Lars J. Aas, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, akim, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Lars J. Aas, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Lars J. Aas, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Lars J. Aas, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/19
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/22
- Re: More exit() troubles - the answer, Lars J. Aas, 2001/01/22