[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH |
Date: |
02 Feb 2001 12:32:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> writes:
Tim> Yes and no. The reason we try to use 'test -x' is so that 'test
Tim> -x foo' will pick up foo.exe. I had not thought of this finding
Tim> directories (then again, I don't have . in my path). I agree this
Tim> is a serious problem; even with no '.' in the PATH
Absolutely.
But I never read explicitly your environment also has this problem.
Has it, or has it not? Because we can
Unix:
test -x && test -f
DOS says no to test -x directory
test -x && :
DOS says yes to test -x directory
test -x && test ! -d
- RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2001/02/01
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Earnie Boyd, 2001/02/02
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/02
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/03
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Earnie Boyd, 2001/02/19
RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/04