[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13 issue with AC_PROG_CXX
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13 issue with AC_PROG_CXX |
Date: |
23 Feb 2001 18:13:42 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
On Feb 22, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <address@hidden> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva writes:
>> I wish all of AC_PROG_CC, AC_PROG_CXX, etc, would have variants or
>> extra arguments that would cause them to be non-fatal in case a
>> compiler isn't found.
> How about AC_PROG_CC([list], [ACTION-IF-NO]), where ACTION-IF-NO defaults
> to the current AC_MSG_ERROR?
I like it.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me