[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updated win32 macro
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: updated win32 macro |
Date: |
15 Mar 2001 14:05:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden> writes:
>> Then there is yet another thing to introduce IMHO, AC_SYS_WIN32 or
>> so, which does define this symbol to yes/no. You high level macro
>> ac_requires it.
Robert> Doesn't that just check the _current_ support ?
Sorry, I don't understand.
Is the feature your trying to test related to the compiler, or to the
system? If the language is relevant, then indeed AC_SYS is wrong. If
the language is not, then I don't understand your sentence: all that
matters is whether we are running this system or not, to decide, for
instance, of the programs to compile.
- Re: updated win32 macro, (continued)
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- win32 macro version 3, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, edward, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Earnie Boyd, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Earnie Boyd, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- win32 compiler test V3a, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: win32 compiler test V3a, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15