[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf auxdir
From: |
Peter Eisentraut |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf auxdir |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:32:09 +0200 (CEST) |
Akim Demaille writes:
> Really, AC_CONFIG_CONFIGDIR seems the best candidate from the user
> point of view, if we take the full picture into account.
If you were operating in a green field, this would be a valid discussion,
but it seems rather silly to discuss a name change for the exclusive
reason that you don't like the old name. Nothing is more inconsistent
than inconsistencies between versions of the same software.
I realize that AUX_?DIR is less than optimal because it induces people to
select the name 'aux', but that seems to be a an issue for -Wall.
--
Peter Eisentraut address@hidden http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: autoconf auxdir, (continued)
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Lars J. Aas, 2001/04/10
- RE: autoconf auxdir, Tim Van Holder, 2001/04/10
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/10
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Earnie Boyd, 2001/04/10
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: autoconf auxdir,
Peter Eisentraut <=
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/11
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/12
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/12
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Earnie Boyd, 2001/04/12
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/12
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Earnie Boyd, 2001/04/12
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/12
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/04/12
- Re: autoconf auxdir, Lars J. Aas, 2001/04/13