[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
From: |
Steven G. Johnson |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:01:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Roger Leigh wrote:
# Try
# GCC -std=gnu99 -std=c99 -std=iso9899:1999
# AIX -qlanglvl=extc99 -qlanglvl=stdc99
Here are a few more, gleaned from Google (not tested):
IRIX: -c99
(http://www.sgi.com/products/software/irix/tools/c.html,
http://www.chemie.fu-berlin.de/cgi-bin/man/sgi_irix?c99+1)
Tru64: -c99 (http://devrsrc1.external.hp.com/STKT/impacts/i330.html)
Solaris: -xc99 (c99 lang support on by default in newer compilers)
(http://docs.sun.com/source/817-6697/cc_ops.app.html#43104)
Intel icc: -c99
So, -c99 seems to be the most popular.
Steven
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, (continued)
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Noah Misch, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99,
Steven G. Johnson <=
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/12/03
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/03
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/03