[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 12:33:25 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Steven G. Johnson" <address@hidden> writes:
> (Which begs the question: shouldn't AC_PROG_CC_STDC be renamed to
> AC_PROG_CC_C89, for consistency?)
Yes, and AC_PROG_CC_STDC should refer to the best (typically, latest)
C standard. That is, AC_PROG_CC_STDC should attempt to set the
compiler into C99 mode, and failing that should attempt to set it in
C89 mode. So Roger, please make that part of the next revision for
your patch.
Also, Roger you'll need to get papers signed for your contribution
to Autoconf. Have you already started the ball rolling on this?
If not, I can send you the initial forms.
- AC_PROG_CC_C99, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Steven G. Johnson, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Noah Misch, 2004/12/02