[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf and apt
From: |
Erik de Castro Lopo |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf and apt |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:42:53 +1000 |
Allan Clark wrote:
> ugh, maintaining that list could suck, but this is the
> possibility that this kind of step takes in a way that doesn't put the
> maintenance burden onto Autoconf's shoulders.
My suggestion was intended to put the burden of maintaining this
on the shoulders of whoever maintains configure.ac, not autoconf.
Erik
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Never argue with stupid people. They'll just drag you down to
their level and beat you with experience
- Autoconf and apt, Robert Rehammar, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Robert Rehammar, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Allan Clark, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt,
Erik de Castro Lopo <=
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Allan Clark, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Allan Clark, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Braden McDaniel, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Tim Post, 2008/08/19
Re: Autoconf and apt, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/19