[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means
From: |
Tom Browder |
Subject: |
Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts) |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:38:59 -0500 |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
...
>> Anyhow, I would like to be able to use Perl (or any other language) if
>> it is found during the configure process.
>
> You can already do that. Whatever is found is placed in $PERL.
Paolo, can you please point to an example? I can't find that in the
autoconf manual.
Thanks.
Regards,
-Tom
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Tom Browder, 2008/10/26
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Eric Blake, 2008/10/27
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/27
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/29
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Tom Browder, 2008/10/30
- Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/30
Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts), Tom Browder, 2008/10/29