autoconf
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
# or dnl for comments?
From
:
Dr. David Kirkby
Subject
:
# or dnl for comments?
Date
:
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:35:47 +0100
User-agent
:
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090218)
I see a mix of # and 'dnl' to start comments. Why is this? The more
common '#' seems most useful, but I guess there is a reason for using dnl.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
# or dnl for comments?
,
Dr. David Kirkby
<=
Re: # or dnl for comments?
,
Josef Vukovic
,
2009/08/11
Re: # or dnl for comments?
,
Ben Pfaff
,
2009/08/11
Message not available
Re: # or dnl for comments?
,
Dr. David Kirkby
,
2009/08/12
Re: # or dnl for comments?
,
Josef Vukovic
,
2009/08/17
Prev by Date:
Re: Question on Tru64 compiler options
Next by Date:
Re: # or dnl for comments?
Previous by thread:
conftest.j
Next by thread:
Re: # or dnl for comments?
Index(es):
Date
Thread