[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wrong example in AC_CHECK_TYPE documentation
From: |
Julien ÉLIE |
Subject: |
Wrong example in AC_CHECK_TYPE documentation |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:30:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Hi,
The documentation for AC_CHECK_TYPE gives the following example:
use AC_CHECK_TYPES together with
#ifndef HAVE_LOFF_T
typedef loff_t off_t;
#endif
* Shouldn't it be "typedef off_t loff_t;" instead?
* Wouldn't it also be better to mention the fact that AC_TYPE_OFF_T
should be called so as to define off_t, if need be?
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Il y a trois façons de faire les choses : la bonne, la mauvaise,
et la mienne. »
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Wrong example in AC_CHECK_TYPE documentation,
Julien ÉLIE <=