[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future
From: |
NightStrike |
Subject: |
Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:59:18 -0400 |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 5:08 PM Zack Weinberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> I didn't get any suggestions of additional autoconf-using software
> packages to test. To my mind, that is the biggest remaining hole in
> the plan. Please suggest any software you know of whose autoconf
> usage is particularly complicated or fragile and I'll add it to my
> list of things to test.
GCC/Binutils/GDB, and the whole "cygnus" tree.
- Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future, (continued)
- Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future, Per Bothner, 2020/03/09
- Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future, Michael Orlitzky, 2020/03/09
- Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/03/10
- Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future, Zack Weinberg, 2020/03/23
- Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future, Marko Lindqvist, 2020/03/24
- Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future, Bruno Haible, 2020/03/13