[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On time64 and Large File Support
From: |
Arsen Arsenović |
Subject: |
Re: On time64 and Large File Support |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:26:04 +0100 |
Evening,
Adam Sampson <ats@offog.org> writes:
> If the consensus on this does come down to the definition of new
> architecture triplets, are there any other changes that should (or
> could) be made at the same time, beyond time64 and LFS?
Forwarding a suggestion from Arfrever:
> Please consider making regoff_t 64-bit, on both 32-bit and 64-bit
> architectures.
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5945
> https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Regular-expressions
If an ABI break is inevitable, or a new ABI for the multilib setups,
this seems like a reasonable thing to include in it from my POV.
Have a good one.
--
Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: On time64 and Large File Support, (continued)
Re: On time64 and Large File Support, Wookey, 2022/11/11
Re: On time64 and Large File Support, Paul Eggert, 2022/11/12
Re: On time64 and Large File Support, Adam Sampson, 2022/11/14
Re: On time64 and Large File Support, Richard Purdie, 2022/11/11