autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-fu


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:34:48 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 2023-12-12 01:32, Arsen Arsenović wrote:

Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> writes:
Although it'll be helpful for Autoconf to work by default with those two
options, it's not essential because it's bad advice for builders to *configure*
with all the options suggested in "Compiler Options Hardening Guide for C and
C++"[1]. The advice should merely be to *build* with those options.

These options tell compilers to work as the C standard requires.  They
will soon not be flags that need to be added explicitly.  See:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/87ttp3tek1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com/

Thanks for the heads-up; I wasn't aware of that effort. However, the behavior it's proposing (defaulting to errors for -Wint-conversion, Wreturn-mismatch, -Wdeclaration-missing-parameter-type, -Wincompatible-pointer-types) shouldn't be much of a problem for Autoconf. These warnings are less intrusive and controversial than the warning options suggested in [1] and I don't think they'll be much of a problem for Autoconf or for Autoconf-using programs.


This is because the recommended options include controversial ones like
-Wconversion that can be harmful in C code. The only way to pacify -Wconversion
is to complicate the code by inserting casts that can lower code safety and
quality. Even Gnulib, which goes far beyond [1] in recommending warning
options, disables -Wconversion.

I'm not sure I agree that handling real lossy conversions lowers code
quality, but this flag is not a behavior required by the standard, so I
suppose not assuming it is OK.

Yes, although -Wconversion can sometimes be useful unfortunately it too often forces you to put in casts that can mask serious problems later. The C standard doesn't require -Wconversion diagnostics and I expect it never will.

[1]: https://best.openssf.org/Compiler-Hardening-Guides/Compiler-Options-Hardening-Guide-for-C-and-C++



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]