[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GCL compliance and Bill Schelter
From: |
Mike Dewar |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GCL compliance and Bill Schelter |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 09:59:39 +0100 |
Hi Mike,
Your point seemed very plain to me. You described the source of the
"gift" of Axiom code as "an appalling example of the subjugation ... "
etc. You copied the message to the axiom-developer list where everybody
knows that NAG was that source. I'm happy to accept your clarification,
and to resume my place amongst the good guys :-) I would however echo
Tim Daly's comments about the IBM team, who were (and still are,
although they are no longer working together) a tremendous bunch of
individuals.
Cheers, Mike.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:28:45AM +1000, Mike Thomas wrote:
> Hi Mike.
>
> Unfortunately I didn't made my point clearly enough and you have got the
> wrong end of the stick.
>
> | > From a practical point of view, I would hate to look a gift
> | horse (free BSD
> | > Axiom)in the mouth when the gift came from such an appalling
> | example (IBM,
> | > at the very least from the Thomas J Watson years apparently) of the
> | > subjugation of moral responsibility to commercial and 20th century right
> | > wing political imperatives.
> | The "gift", as you call it, came from NAG, not IBM. Perhaps you would
> | like to retract this statement or clarify in what way we are "an
> | appalling example of the subjugation of moral responsibility to
> | commercial and 20th century right wing political imperatives".
>
> I didn't make myself sufficiently clear, I was referring to IBM, not NAG.
>
> If you would like to look further into why I said this about IBM in the
> Thomas J Watson years, I suggest you read:
>
> Black, Edwin, "IBM and the Holocaust - The Strategic Alliance Between Nazi
> Germany and America's Most Powerful Corporation", 2001, Little, Brown and
> Company, London.
>
> I'm sorry for not being sufficiently clear on that and for not being
> sufficiently clear on my real (but unfortunately implied) point, which was:
>
> - I felt that it was better not to try and link the licencing terms of
> Axiom with the licencing terms of GCL through the GPL.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mike Thomas.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
> ________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
- [Axiom-developer] GCL compliance and Bill Schelter, root, 2003/07/24
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [Maxima] GCL compliance and Bill Schelter, C Y, 2003/07/24
- [Axiom-developer] Re: GCL compliance and Bill Schelter, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/24
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: GCL compliance and Bill Schelter, Mike Dewar, 2003/07/25
- Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: GCL compliance and Bill Schelter, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/25
- Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: GCL compliance and Bill Schelter, Mike Dewar, 2003/07/29
[Axiom-developer] Small patches, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/24