[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath
From: |
Page, Bill |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:56:33 -0400 |
Martin,
On Thursday, October 20, 2005 5:45 AM you wrote:
> ...
> Bill Page wrote:
> >
> > Besides a stronger discipline, how can we insure that our
> > LaTeX coding meets certain minimum standards so that it
> > doesn't cause the conversion programs to barf? Do you know
> > of any sort of 'lint' program for LaTeX that could detect
> > and warn about the "wrong way" of doing things?
>
> I think that chktex does this:
>
> http://baruch.ev-en.org/proj/chktex/
>
> it issues warnings about possible typographical errors.
>
Excellent! I think I will add this as an online tool in
MathAction.
> On the other hand, we could simply say: a proper pamphlet
> file is a file that is correctly processed by latex and
> tex4ht. :-)
>
No!! That would be a mistake similar to defining HTML as the
language accepted by the Microsoft Internet Explorer browser.
Since we can do much better than that, we should.
Regards,
Bill Page.
- [Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath, Bill Page, 2005/10/15
- [Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath, Page, Bill, 2005/10/19
- [Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath, Page, Bill, 2005/10/20
- [Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath, Page, Bill, 2005/10/20
- [Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath,
Page, Bill <=
- [Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath, Page, Bill, 2005/10/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: tex4ht and jsmath, Page, Bill, 2005/10/20