[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:39:00 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:
...
>> Hey all - been a bit quiet lately :-). I was wondering, has
>> anybody heard anything new on the status of Aldor?
>>
>
> No... and it is quite discouraging.
>
> Please write to Steven Watt at
>
> address@hidden
>
> and ask him.
Would it help to have more people write?
>> > From: Stephen Watt [mailto:address@hidden
>> > Sent: October 20, 2005 11:07 PM
>> > To: Bill Page
>> > Subject: Re: compiling Aldor from source for x86-64
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Bill,
>> >
>> > This is to let you know that I got your message. I've taken
>> > a bit longer to respond than planned because we are now
>> > contemplating adopting a complete open source license for
>> > everyone. This might take a bit of time, however, so it
>> > might make sense to go ahead on an individual basis with
>> > you beforehand.
I don't understand this. If it isn't open source for everyone, it
isn't open source. (I'm guessing open source will also mean free.)
So what would the individual basis be?
Jay
- [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, C Y, 2006/01/11
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Bill Page, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?,
Jay Belanger <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Bill Page, 2006/01/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Jay Belanger, 2006/01/12
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Bill Page, 2006/01/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Jay Belanger, 2006/01/13
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Bill Page, 2006/01/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Jay Belanger, 2006/01/13
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, C Y, 2006/01/12
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Karl Hegbloom, 2006/01/12
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Bill Page, 2006/01/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor?, Doug Stewart, 2006/01/12