[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Axiom-developer] B#
From: |
Page, Bill |
Subject: |
RE: [Axiom-developer] B# |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:21:44 -0500 |
On Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:01 PM Tim Daly (root) wrote:
> Bill Page wrote:
> > Apparently Tim is not so convinced of the future of
> > Aldor. :(
>
> I'm not? News to me. --Tim
>
Oh, ok. Good.
Then does that mean you also agree with the larger
context of this quote: that we should only plan to
eliminate BOOT when we can also eliminate SPAD in
favour of Aldor and B# in favour of the current Axiom
intepreter? In other words: when we can eliminate those
components dependent on BOOT?
Regards,
Bill Page.
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, C Y, 2006/03/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/27
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#,
Page, Bill <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Page, Bill, 2006/03/23
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Page, Bill, 2006/03/24
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Page, Bill, 2006/03/24