[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: Rng
From: |
Martin Rubey |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: Rng |
Date: |
28 Jul 2006 08:55:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
unfortunately, I'm out of time currently, but:
root <address@hidden> writes:
> Axiom has some categories, such as RNG, which don't seem to match those of
> regular math. One question is whether this is just a design flaw or does it
> expose a new computational object that we need to examine theoretically.
No. RNG is quite standard in Algebra. I think it's even in Hungerford. I cannot
see a design flaw there.
Martin
- Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, root, 2006/07/26
- Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, root, 2006/07/26
- Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/07/26
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Page, Bill, 2006/07/27
- Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, root, 2006/07/26
- RNG vs. RING was: Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/07/27
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Rng,
Martin Rubey <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Rng, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/07/28
- Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/07/27
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Page, Bill, 2006/07/26
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Weiss, Juergen, 2006/07/26
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Page, Bill, 2006/07/26
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, C Y, 2006/07/26
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Page, Bill, 2006/07/26
- Re: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/07/26
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, C Y, 2006/07/26
- RE: [Axiom-developer] sbcl and Axiom, Page, Bill, 2006/07/26