|
From: | Ralf Hemmecke |
Subject: | Re: [Axiom-developer] Fwd: [M#73697383] Re: Disk-quota Request |
Date: | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:12:02 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) |
On 09/15/2006 04:39 AM, root wrote:
Yes, some are quite terrible and contribute to the rather rough appearance, for example of the Axiom Tutorial book. We should beHas someone looked at the pictures in src/doc/ps ? To me more than half of them look generated by Axiom, the rest is screenshots of HyperDoc. Both have terribly low resolution.able to do better. As I said earlier, I don't think things that can be generated from Axiom belong in the archive. The instructions for generating them - yes, but not the output.Those files are part of the original Axiom book (the Jenks book) and clearly represent source for the book.
No. The source is a Makefile that reproduces the graphs in exactly the same way as they are now. BUT, for future versions of the Axiom Book, the Makefile should set the option to produce higher resolution graphs. So the actual source is MISSING or HIDDEN inside the Axiom book.
One of the outstanding problems I have to solve is how to place more than one image on a page. That's the one blocking condition to reproducing the Jenks book accurately. t
Without a clear problem description, nobody is able to help. Ralf
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |