[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex
From: |
Waldek Hebisch |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:01:02 +0200 (CEST) |
Bill Page wrote:
> On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> >
> > For example latex run on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the
> > following errors (I removedother messages which are caused by
> > the two errors):
> >
> > ! Missing $ inserted.
> > <inserted text>
> > $
> > l.13 ...aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_
> >
> > aux.h}\endmoddef\nwstartde...
> > ...
>
> On October 22, 2006 10:04 AM I wrote:
> >
> > I do not get any errors in files containing _ in either Tim's
> > version distributed with Gold nor with a more recent unmodified
> > version of noweb (noweb-2.11b).
> >
>
> In contrast to the output which Waldek shows, in both versions
> of noweb run on axiom-developer.org the _ is removed from the
> generated noweb commands.\:
>
> \section{parse\_aux.h}
> \nwfilename{parse_aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parseaux.h}\endmoddef
> \LA{}license\RA{}
>
> -----
>
> Could this be a LOCALE/LANG issue? Or is this behaviour specific
> to the version of noweb distributed by Debian?
>
On 32-bit Debian Sarge with "nowebm 2.10c-3.2" I get the output you
show. But on 64-bit Debian testing/unstable using "nowebm 2.10c-3.3"
I get:
\section{parse\_aux.h}
\nwfilename{parse_aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_aux.h}\endmoddef\nwstartdeflinemarkup\nwenddeflinemarkup
\LA{}license\RA{}
Note that strictly speaking both forms are problematic: the first mangles
names, the second passes naked underscore to latex (maybe the intention
was to update '\moddef' so that it can handle underscores).
--
Waldek Hebisch
address@hidden
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/21
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex,
Waldek Hebisch <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Norman Ramsey, 2006/10/22
RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Norman Ramsey, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22