[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2007 13:58:14 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 22 May 2007, address@hidden wrote:
| The claim that C++ is "standard" is as weak or strong as the claim
| that ANSI is standard. No vendor complies 100% because opinions
| vary.
You don't need to have it 100%. More over, you just don't need a standard;
you need a useful standard. Those were the points.
| If you look at the ANSI lisp standard you'll see "comments" and
| "unresolved" issues. I haven't looked at the C++ standard but I'd bet
| that the same things exist there.
There are many; but none that poses similar issues as those encountered with
the various Lisp implementations.
-- Gaby
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Lisp portability, (continued)
Re: [Axiom-developer] Lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
[Axiom-developer] lisp portability, daly, 2007/05/22
[Axiom-developer] lisp portability, daly, 2007/05/22
- [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
- [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
- [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
- [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability,
Gabriel Dos Reis <=
- [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, C Y, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, C Y, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22
[Axiom-developer] Re: lisp portability, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/22