[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC
From: |
Stephen Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC |
Date: |
01 Aug 2007 18:03:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
Gabriel Dos Reis <address@hidden> writes:
> (iii) of course, the answer is yes. As I mentioned earlier, there are two
> parser in Axiom, an old and a new. You're looking at the old compiler.
Of course I am looking at the old compiler, it is the only compiler.
It accepts one AST, not two. That AST does not contain line/column
information. The AST which Axiom uses does not contain line/column
information. That information is intentionally erased at one point of
parsing or another, old or new, it does not matter.
> | The system is not extensible or flexible by any rational
> | measurement.
>
> I suspect it is more accurate to say:
>
> The system is not extensible or flexible by any Stephen Wilson's
> measurement.
>
> Care should be exercised before generalizing to "rational".
Yep, absolutely. That is my opinion. Rational thinking was used to
formulate it.
As for the rest of your post, I am not even going to bother trying to
explain. If you dont understand the issues, thats your problem.
>
> | > (2) And, as expected, your questions were rhetorical.
> |
> | Of course they were. I was trying to explain the work I am doing and
> | you effectively dismissed it by saying "you dont need to wait for a
> | new compiler", which is not true.
>
> "dismiss" is the way you chose to see a *factual statement* that
> the current compiler can be used as a library roday, and that has been
> done for real.
>
> I would not venture to say that if I speculated you would have interpreted
> it as "celebrated". Anyway, I'm quite amazed.
>
> [...]
>
> | I will be more than happy to discount your autoconf patch when it is
> | ready based on the fact that we already have a build system which more
> | or less works, if your interested in that kind of collaboration.
>
> You must have a serious problem.
>
> -- Gaby
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC,
Stephen Wilson <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Bill Page, 2007/08/02
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/02
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Weiss, Juergen, 2007/08/03
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/03
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/08/02