bug-auctex
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#65628: Document preview fails with long filenames


From: David Kastrup
Subject: bug#65628: Document preview fails with long filenames
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 19:35:13 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

John Holman <john.g.holman@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi. I'm not sure that the problem was captured in the log below created
> by preview-report-bug so a few more details first:
>
> Running auctex on windows 11 with MiKTeX
>
> Test file contents (but most files containing maths seem to trigger the
> problem)
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \begin{document}
>
> \(x=y\)
>
> \end{document}
>
> Document preview works when the filename has no more than 22 characters,
> e.g. test.tex, but fails with message "Ghostscript filter: No bounding box"
> when the filename has more, e.g. 01234567890123456789012.tex. However
> buffer preview always works.
>
> When document preview fails the maths sections are replaced with the
> roadworks signs indefinitely. The 01234567890123456789012.prv directory is
> created
> containing a temp folder containing a preview.dsc file but no png
> images. The rungs.exe and mgs.exe processes don't exit until killed manually
> or emacs is closed.
>
> The contents of the *.. output* buffer are then
>
> Running `Preview-LaTeX' on `012345678901234546789012' with ``pdflatex
>  -file-line-error
>  
> "\nonstopmode\nofiles\PassOptionsToPackage{active,tightpage,auctex}{preview}\AtBeginDocument{\ifx\ifPreview\undefined\RequirePackage[displaymath,floats,graphics,textmath,sections,footnotes]{preview}[2004/11/05]\fi}"
> "\input" "\detokenize{" "012345678901234546789012.tex" "}"''

Probably exceeding a total command line length of 256 characters or some
similar Windows restriction.  I also seem to remember that some Windows
file system or API limited the length of absolute filenames you could
access even when only using relative filenames, so the length of the
directory path you are in might also play a part here.

-- 
David Kastrup





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]