Re: Controlling the effects of precedence declarations

[Hans Aberg]

At 05:04 +0200 2003/05/14, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>> Then the set of precedence restrictions is empty in the case you do not
>> need it.
>
>As I said, I need it in a few cases. But I don't want the set to
>become bigger by "accidental" precedence relations.

By the description I gave about parse tree limitations, it is possible to
implement such precedence systems.

>> I think the most philosophical restriction against featuritis in this group
>> is to find somebody willing to implement it. :-)
>
>OK. Here's a patch against 20030320, hope that's alright.

You have to bring the attention to Akim Demaille or perhaps Paul Eggert.
There is a Bison-Patch list as well. (I am not doing Bison programming
right now.)


  Hans Aberg