[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GLR: modification of $1
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: GLR: modification of $1 |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 20:34:50 +0200 |
At 03:08 +0200 2003/10/05, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>> So this suggests that one, at least for now, should only admit a rule
>> midaction to assign to its $$ value, and it can only use the $n values
>> referring to the variables/tokens/midactions before it in the rule. If the
>> $n values can be implemented as const values, that seems to be an advantage
>> under this model.
>
>I'd second this -- and suggest that it be clearly stated in the
>documentation (either for GLR or in general, whichever is the actual
>intention).
It should be clearly stated in the manual that $k cannot be changed (or
rather, attempting to do so gives a result that is undefined).
Hans Aberg
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, (continued)
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Paul Eggert, 2003/10/02
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Frank Heckenbach, 2003/10/02
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Paul Hilfinger, 2003/10/02
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Frank Heckenbach, 2003/10/02
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Paul Eggert, 2003/10/03
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Frank Heckenbach, 2003/10/04
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Paul Eggert, 2003/10/05
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Frank Heckenbach, 2003/10/05
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Hans Aberg, 2003/10/04
- Re: GLR: modification of $1, Frank Heckenbach, 2003/10/04
- Re: GLR: modification of $1,
Hans Aberg <=
Re: GLR: modification of $1, Paul Eggert, 2003/10/05