[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: variables in yyparse
From: |
Laurence Finston |
Subject: |
Re: variables in yyparse |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:00:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
IMHO/0.98.3+G (Webmail for Roxen) |
> >>> From: Hans Aberg <address@hidden>
What I don't quite understand is why there needs to be a heap at all in the
`bss' section, when it seems to me from your explanations and Paul's that two
addresses, a lower and upper bound, would be sufficient. Or is the `bss'
section now used only for the stack? Couldn't the stack be handled the same
way? Wouldn't it then be possible to reduce the executable to code,
initialized data, and some bookkeeping information?
Clearly, I'm going to have read up on this topic.
>
> The point is that it may not be worth the trouble to write ones own virtual
> memory management routines.
>
It didn't occur to me that what I was planning was similar to virtual memory
management. If the system will take care of this problem for me, I will be
happy to let it. I'll try exhausting my heap memory sometime and see what
happens.
Thanks for the information and the references.
Laurence
- Re: variables in yyparse, (continued)
- Re: variables in yyparse, Laurence Finston, 2004/12/19
- Re: variables in yyparse, Paul Hilfinger, 2004/12/19
- Re: variables in yyparse, Laurence Finston, 2004/12/19
- Re: variables in yyparse, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: variables in yyparse, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/20
- Re: variables in yyparse, Laurence Finston, 2004/12/20
- Re: variables in yyparse, Laurence Finston, 2004/12/20
- Re: variables in yyparse, Laurence Finston, 2004/12/20
- Re: variables in yyparse, Hans Aberg, 2004/12/19
- Re: variables in yyparse, Hans Aberg, 2004/12/19
- Re: variables in yyparse,
Laurence Finston <=
Re: variables in yyparse, Paul Hilfinger, 2004/12/19
Re: variables in yyparse, Hans Aberg, 2004/12/20