[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash vs. sh
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: Bash vs. sh |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:52:57 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Paul Hilfinger wrote:
> The bootstrap file is headed
>
> #! /bin/sh
>
> However, it contains lines such as
>
> if ! "$SHA1SUM" -c --status "$cksum_file" < "$new_po" > /dev/null; then
>
> and
>
> if ! test -d "$dst_dir"; then
>
> In a standard Solaris 10 installation, /bin/sh does not recognize the
> '!' command. I had to fix this by changing the shell used by
> bootstrap to /bin/bash.
Thanks for the report. I don't know whether Bison should switch to
/bin/bash or just weed out Bash-specific code. This feels like a question
for Paul Eggert.
- Re: Bash vs. sh,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Joel E. Denny, 2008/04/20
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Eric Blake, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/22
- Message not available
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Joel E. Denny, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Joel E. Denny, 2008/04/22
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/23
- Re: Bash vs. sh, Joel E. Denny, 2008/04/23