Re: FreeBSD Problems

[David Sugar]

I will need to try a full Bayonne build under FreeBSD again...

On Wednesday 06 November 2002 08:31, Federico Montesino Pouzols wrote:
> With the "extern" trick it seems to compile and work well. The
> fix is in CVS.
>
>       The time.h of FreeBSD does not declare nanosleep unless you
> define a very peculiar symbol for posix 1003.1b.
>
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:13:07PM -0500, David Sugar wrote:
> > Well, let's see if we can solve the first problem immediately in the
> > distrubution and then get a nice "ports" package that is current...
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Ari Johnson wrote:
> > > I'd say that the native thread library is the way to go.  FreeBSD
> > > implements pthreads quite nicely, and I've had excellent luck using
> > > them with CommonC++.  The problems come in with things like friends.cpp
> > > failing to compile because nanosleep() isn't declared (putting an
> > > extern "C" declaration for it right where it's used in a macro in
> > > cc++/config.h works for me), and the fact that I absolutely cannot
> > > compile the library with GCC 3.x, due to some kind of screwy include
> > > file monkey business; although I can compile anything else with GCC 3.x
> > > just fine.
> > >  -- Ari Johnson
> > >
> > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, David Sugar wrote:
> > > > I would like to see us have a clean and consistent build under
> > > > FreeBSD. Currently, there are two choices possible with it; one to
> > > > build against LinuxThreads, and one to do so with the native runtime
> > > > thread library. Which do you think would be better for FreeBSD?
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Ari Johnson wrote:
> > > > > I think I'm going to just sit down and try to figure out what's
> > > > > wrong with CommonC++ (from cvs) on FreeBSD.  I keep figuring out a
> > > > > quick hack around things, but they are things that should be fixed.
> > > > >  So here's #1:
> > > > >
> > > > > friends.cpp: In function `static void ost::Thread::sleep(long
> > > > > unsigned int)': friends.cpp:134: implicit declaration of function
> > > > > `int ost::nanosleep(...)'
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone with insight as to why this is occurring?
> > > > >  -- Ari Johnson
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> > > > > address@hidden
> > > > > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp