[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DDD 3.3.1 (i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) gets `Segmentation fault' signal
|
From: |
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) |
|
Subject: |
Re: DDD 3.3.1 (i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) gets `Segmentation fault' signal |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:26:45 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 06:06:10 -0400, Stew Benedict wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> > I'm running out of ideas here; you could still try
> > frame 11
> > info locals
> > frame 10
> > info locals
> > etc. and see if there is something recognisable as "obviously wrong".
> I'm sorry,
>
> You lost me with the "frame11, info locals, etc." Is this something I
> would do in efence?
No, in gdb ("gdb ddd core").
HTH,
Ray
--
To this day we are still wondering what exactly it is, besides prices, that
Microsoft has innovated.
Seen on segfault.org