Re: [bug-gawk] useless array length abstraction

[arnold]

> Will do. Is it OK if the patch to reset the array type to null when the
> last element is deleted is consolidated in the same patch, or should that
> be committed separately? And does that one belong in master as well,
> or might you consider putting it in stable?

It should probably be a separate patch, since it addresses a different
issue. Please do it just in master.  THe next release will be from
there.

> > > But taking another step back, I'm not sure why these array methods are
> > > implemented as an array of function pointers instead of as a struct
> > > with a field for each method.
> > 
> > This would be a step forward.  If you can work up a patch for that for
> > review, I'd appreciate it.
>
> I will see how difficult this is.

Great, thanks.

Arnold