[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q: ld-linux.2 bug in glibc2.2.2?
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
Subject: |
Re: Q: ld-linux.2 bug in glibc2.2.2? |
Date: |
27 Feb 2001 09:55:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
Basile STARYNKEVITCH <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Jaeger <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Andreas> Basile STARYNKEVITCH <address@hidden>
> Andreas> writes:
>
> Andreas> If your binary is broken, it's a bug in your binary and
> Andreas> we will not fix it - we can't check each and every
> Andreas> access.
>
> Well, I have no warning or error message. Neither from ld not from the
> dynamic linker. I would expect that ld-linux.2 should be able to run
> an ELF executable -very similar to gcc produced ones- for which
> /usr/bin/ld does not give any error or warning. The ldscript I use
> contains all the sections from /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.x
You might hit a bug - but without a description it's not possible to
tell.
> I feel that my binary is unorthodox but not broken. I am not sure of
> it. (but I do not know well all specific requirements of Linux ELF. In
> particular the role and place of the .note.run-ABI section).
>
> Is the number (or indexes) of PT_LOAD-ed segments hardwired in the
> ld-linux.so.2 code? I do not think it is....
I don't think so but check the elf subdir,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs address@hidden
private address@hidden
http://www.suse.de/~aj