[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not a bug but...
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
Subject: |
Re: Not a bug but... |
Date: |
29 Mar 2001 08:28:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
"Rainer Mager" <address@hidden> writes:
> > Did you strip the library?
> >
> > Andreas
>
> Nope, I did nothing to it that 'make install' doesn't do.
>
> $ file /lib/libc-*
> /lib/libc-2.1.3.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1,
> not stripped
> /lib/libc-2.2.1.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1,
> not stripped
> /lib/libc-2.2.2.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1,
> not stripped
Just compare (my libc.so.6 is a 2.2.2):
gee:/tmp:[1]$ ls -l libc.so.6
-rwxr-xr-x 1 aj suse 4891341 Mar 29 08:26 libc.so.6
gee:/tmp:[0]$ strip libc.so.6
gee:/tmp:[0]$ ls -l libc.so.6
-rwxr-xr-x 1 aj suse 1211412 Mar 29 08:27 libc.so.6
You must have stripped at least a bit - or compiled without debugging
symbols.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs address@hidden
private address@hidden
http://www.suse.de/~aj
- glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Not a bug but..., Rainer Mager, 2001/03/28
- Re: Not a bug but..., Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/29
- RE: Not a bug but..., Rainer Mager, 2001/03/29
- Re: Not a bug but...,
Andreas Jaeger <=