[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setitimer() bug? (Linux, glibc 2.2)
|
From: |
Ulrich Drepper |
|
Subject: |
Re: setitimer() bug? (Linux, glibc 2.2) |
|
Date: |
29 Mar 2001 11:35:51 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Thelxepeia) |
"Michael Kerrisk" <address@hidden> writes:
> 17221 The setitimer( ) function shall fail if:
> 17222 [EINVAL] The value argument is not in canonical form. (In canonical
> form, the number of
> 17223 microseconds is a non-negative integer less than 1,000,000 and the
> number of
> 17224 seconds is a non-negative integer.)
setitimer() is implemented in the kernel.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------