[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in exit()?
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in exit()? |
Date: |
24 Apr 2001 09:32:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
"Michael Kerrisk" <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I've tested the following with glibc 2.1.3 (Linux kernel 2.2.14, SuSE6.4),
> but looking at the sources of glibc 2.2.3pre1, things don't look the same.
>
> Ths is rather a "philosophical" bug report. The exit() function does not
> appear to close stdio streams, although SUSv3 and Austin do specifythis.
> I discovered this while checking out some behaviours of vfork() - in a
> vforked child, I did an exit(), and found that the standard I/O streams
> *weren't* closed in the parent process when it resumed.
>
> I assume there are reasons things are done this way. Are there plans to
> change this behaviour?
Do you have a sample program that shows the problem?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs address@hidden
private address@hidden
http://www.suse.de/~aj
- Bug in exit()?, Michael Kerrisk, 2001/04/24
- Re: Bug in exit()?,
Andreas Jaeger <=
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Michael Kerrisk, 2001/04/24
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Wolfram Gloger, 2001/04/24
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Michael Kerrisk, 2001/04/24
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/04/24
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Michael Kerrisk, 2001/04/25
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/04/25
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Mike Castle, 2001/04/25
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/04/25
- Re: Bug in exit()?, Wolfram Gloger, 2001/04/25