bug-glibc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Romanian locale for Romania


From: Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcã
Subject: Re: Romanian locale for Romania
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:55:17 +0200 (CEST)

> 
> That looks indeed wrong but since none of the people who works on this
> knows the right answer we won't change anything.  If you provide a
> patch (or say what the right values are) I'll change it.
> 

Thank you for your answer. Here are the values I would use instead
in LC_TIME in the ro_RO file.

========================cut here============================
abday   "<U0044><U0075>";"<U004C><U0075>";"<U004D><U0061>";"<U004D><U0069>";/
        "<U004A><U006F>";"<U0056><U0069>";"<U0053><U00EE>"
day     "<U0044><U0075><U006D><U0069><U006E><U0069><U0063><U0102>";/
        "<U004C><U0075><U006E><U0069>";/
        "<U004D><U0061><U0072><U021B><U0069>";/
        "<U004D><U0069><U0065><U0072><U0063><U0075><U0072><U0069>";/
        "<U004A><U006F><U0069>";/
        "<U0056><U0069><U006E><U0065><U0072><U0069>";/
        "<U0053><U00EE><U006D><U0062><U0102><U0074><U0102>"
abmon   "<U0069><U0061><U006E>";"<U0066><U0065><U0062>";/
        "<U006D><U0061><U0072>";"<U0061><U0070><U0072>";/
        "<U006D><U0061><U0069>";"<U0069><U0075><U006E>";/
        "<U0069><U0075><U006C>";"<U0061><U0075><U0067>";/
        "<U0073><U0065><U0070>";"<U006F><U0063><U0074>";/
        "<U006E><U006F><U0076>";"<U0064><U0065><U0063>"
mon     "<U0049><U0061><U006E><U0075><U0061><U0072><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U0046><U0065><U0062><U0072><U0075><U0061><U0072><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U004D><U0061><U0072><U0074><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U0041><U0070><U0072><U0069><U006C><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U004D><U0061><U0069>";/
        "<U0049><U0075><U006E><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U0049><U0075><U006C><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U0041><U0075><U0067><U0075><U0073><U0074>";/
        
"<U0053><U0065><U0070><U0074><U0065><U006D><U0062><U0072><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U004F><U0063><U0074><U006F><U006D><U0062><U0072><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U004E><U006F><U0069><U0065><U006D><U0062><U0072><U0069><U0065>";/
        "<U0044><U0065><U0063><U0065><U006D><U0062><U0072><U0069><U0065>"
=========================cut here=======================================

Where I can read something about the other fields? I mean about LC_XXXXX?
Since I don't know what they mean to be, I can tell you if they are set
OK or not.

Thank you for your help,

                Ionel

P.S. When fonts for iso-8859-16 will be available (like biznet
for iso-8859-2), t_cedilla has to be change to t_comma_below.


-- 
                     Ionel  Mugurel   Ciobîcă                    
 Schuit   Institute  of   Catalysis   Phone: 00 31 (0)40 2473781 
 Eindhoven University of Technology   Fax:   00 31 (0)40 2455054 
 Laboratory  of  Catalysis,   _SKA_   e-mail: address@hidden 
 Theory Group, STW 4.27, POBox 513 5600MB Eindhoven, Netherlands 
                                                                 
   .''`.               (o-    On the requirements it said   -o)  
  : :'  :              //\    Windows 95 or better          /\\  
  `. `'`               V_/_   ... so I installed Linux     _\_V  
    `-  www.Debian.org                                           



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]