Re: GLIBC 2.2.4 ?

[Andreas Jaeger]

Frédéric L. W. Meunier <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:05:05PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Frédéric L. W. Meunier <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > 
>> >> We have no date - and we do not know whether it will address
>> >> the GCC 3.0 issues since those are rather complex.
>> > 
>> > And what about your GCC patch for atexit ? Will it be
>> > included in GCC 2.95.4 CVS ?
>> 
>> You mean this one?  That will be in 2.95.4.
>> 
>> 2001-04-03  Bernd Schmidt  <address@hidden>
>> 
>>      2001-03-16  Jakub Jelinek  <address@hidden>
>>      * crtstuff.c (init_dummy): Use CRT_END_INIT_DUMMY if defined.
>>      Remove ia32 linux PIC kludge and move it...
>>      * config/i386/linux.h (CRT_END_INIT_DUMMY): ...here.
> 
> No. This patch is in CVS. I'm talking about the second patch.
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2001-07/msg00002.html
> 
> "I believe they have the atexit patch, it is in CVS after all.
> Dunno about the __dso_handle exporting patch without which
> atexit won't work properly."

Jakub, what's the situation of the dso_handle patch?  Can you push it
into GCC if needed, please?

> Do I really need the second patch ? There are distributions

Yes.

> using GCC 2.95.3 + glibc 2.2.3 without it. An example is
> Slackware 8.0.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs address@hidden
   private address@hidden
    http://www.suse.de/~aj