[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.2.4, gsed != sed
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
Subject: |
Re: 2.2.4, gsed != sed |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2001 08:22:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux) |
Ulrich Drepper <address@hidden> writes:
> Andreas Jaeger <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The patch is fine and I'd like to commit it together with a replace of
>> sed with $(SED) in all Makefiles. Uli, what do you think?
>
> I don't like it. We depend everywhere on GNU sed. Nothing else gets
> ever tested. Trying to patch a few places will not help. It's safer
> and much more sane to require NGU sed just as we do for years.
But we check in configure already for gsed and sed - either we
propagate this or we check only for sed.
configure.in has:
AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(SED, gsed sed, --version,
[GNU sed version \([0-9]*\.[0-9.]*\)],
[3.0[2-9]*|3.[1-9]*|[4-9]*],
SED=: aux_missing="$aux_missing sed")
and gsed and SED are not used anywhere...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs address@hidden
private address@hidden
http://www.suse.de/~aj
- 2.2.4, gsed != sed, Toomas Rosin, 2001/12/22
- Re: 2.2.4, gsed != sed, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/12/28
- Re: 2.2.4, gsed != sed, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/12/28
- Re: 2.2.4, gsed != sed, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/12/29
- Re: 2.2.4, gsed != sed, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/12/29
- Re: 2.2.4, gsed != sed, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/12/29