bug-glibc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Not a big Linux expert


From: Salvatore Sorrentino
Subject: RE: Not a big Linux expert
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:18:46 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Easiest thing to do might be to upgrade to redhat 9...
> In general, I hesitate to manually upgrade glibc on
> a production system.  Much safer to stick in a new
> hard drive and install a fresh new copy of red hat.
> - Dan

Hello!
Unfortunately it is not still possible to install Oracle under redhat 9!
The setup fails ( a rather well known problem)

Salvatore

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salvatore Sorrentino
> To: address@hidden
> Sent: 18.06.2003 01:05
> Subject: Not a big Linux expert
> 
> Dear friends,
> I'm not a big Linux expert so I need your help in understanding
> something.
> I am a physicist and usually I analyze data. I needed to install GnomeDb
> 
> in order to interface to an Oracle database. The GnomeDB installation 
> failed because glibc-2.3.2 was needed. glibc-2.3.2 installation also 
> failed because I needed a gcc version > 2.96 ( I work on a RedHat 7.3).
> So I installed the last gcc available. Everything was fine and gcc was 
> installed under /usr/local. Then I tried to install glibc-2.3.2 but
> again 
> the configure does not see the newly installed gcc but only the older
> one.
> It is probably a stupid problem but I did not find any help on the gnu
> web 
> site. Probably this is not the correct mailing-list to contact but in
> the 
> huge list I did not find something better.
> 
> Thanks for your help
> 
> 

-- 
Salvatore


***************************************************************************
*
*  "Who Watches the Watchmen?"
*  
*  
*
***************************************************************************






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]