Re: SIGFPE & fenv.h

[Andreas Jaeger]

Corneliu <address@hidden> writes:

>  Hello, Andreas,
>
> As per these comments
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-glibc/2002-03/msg00203.html
>
> it seems that SIGFPE is not raised by default (at
> least on i386/Linux system and you advice to use
> fenv.h functions.
>  Trying to write this piece of code, it seems that
> these functions don't work too well - see also 
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2002-05/msg00241.html
>
>  I saw your name on different sources, so I took the
> liberty for writing to you directly.
>
> Would it be possible for you to confirm that INDEED
> there is something wrong with these functions. Also,
> is there any other way of changing the default
> behaviour of SIGFPE handling ?

Currently glibc should behave correctly - and if not, please report a
bug via bugzilla (see http://sources.redhat.com/glibc),

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, address@hidden, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

pgpbTEgvvr3Vy.pgp
Description: PGP signature