Re: Test(s) fail, Install aborted

[Kevin Ryde]

"Daryl Smith" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> I'd imagine it would've needed this library in the "make"
> process...(which went smoothly for 4.1.2).  I suppose the question is
> why can't "make check" find it?

The default lazy binding will generally mean an error occurs only when
a particular routine from that libgcc is called.

You can set LD_BIND_NOW=1 to force all bindings to happen immediately,
which might reveal what's missing.  We could have "configure" exercise
one of those to see we're going to get the libgcc we require.

You can also run "ldd" on an executable to see which libgcc, if any,
is being hit.  (With libtool they hide under tests/.libs/lt-t-bswap
etc.)

> I'm not setting any LD_LIBRARY_PATH (_64 or otherwise).  Should I be?

No.  If you set it and don't have /usr/local/lib that's a likely
source of the problem you're seeing.

-- 
All followups to address@hidden please.