bug#34322: reproducibility: absolute file name in tramp.elc

[Stefan Monnier]

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> (defalias 'tramp-lookup-syntax #[257 "\301 \236A\206\f\302\303\"\207"
>> [tramp-syntax #[0 "\301\267\202\n\302\207\303\207\207" [tramp-syntax
>> #s(hash-table size 2 test eq rehash-size 1.5 rehash-threshold 0.8125
>> purecopy t data (ftp 6 sep 8)) default separate]
>> 2 ("/usr/local/src/emacs-26/lisp/net/tramp-compat.elc" . 7408)] error
>> "Wrong `tramp-syntax' %s"] 4 (#$ . 25891)])
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Hmm... looks like a bug in the implementation of defsubst: it works by
replacing references to tramp-compat-tramp-syntax with a copy of the
function's byte-code (this is the #[0 ...] object above, which includes
the source file name info), and later on those copied bytecode objects
are normally spliced into the surrounding bytecode (at which point the
extra source info is dropped), but here it seems like it hasn't been
spliced as it should.

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> (defalias 'tramp-lookup-syntax #[257 "\301\267\202 \302\202 \303\202
>> \236A\206 \304\305\"\207" [tramp-syntax #s(hash-table size 2 test eq
>> rehash-size 1.5 rehash-threshold 0.8125 purecopy t data (ftp 6 sep 10))
>> default separate error "Wrong `tramp-syntax' %s"] 4 (#$ . 25800)])
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Here you can see that there is no nested bytecode object (i.e. no
#[...] with the main #[...]) so the call has been correctly inlined.

> I think whether there is or isn't such a reference depends on whether
> tramp-compat.elc exists when you byte-compile tramp.c.  Try removing

I don't think we've changed anything significant in the implementation
of defsubst so indeed it's likely triggered by something like the order
of compilation.


        Stefan