[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#34678: 26.1; (elisp) `Minor Mode Conventions'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#34678: 26.1; (elisp) `Minor Mode Conventions' |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:18:42 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:09:27 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
>
> It also wouldn't hurt to add a reference to node
> `Minor Mode Conventions' from node `Major Mode
> Conventions'.
>
> Perhaps add a mention in node `Major Mode Conventions'
> similar to this one in (elisp) `Minor Mode Conventions':
>
> In addition, several major mode conventions
> apply to minor modes as well: those regarding
> the names of global symbols, the use of a hook
> at the end of the initialization function, and
> the use of keymaps and other tables.
I don't see why: cross-references don't have to be symmetrical. We
refer to another node for details of something mentioned in passage,
but that other node doesn't have to provide a cross-reference back.