[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug? |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:04:41 +0200 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: casouri@gmail.com, 61403@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 20:36:22 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Maybe so, but not for this case: I see absolutely no reason to
> > "de-fontify" TEST_STATIC here, as it is part of the type.
>
> It actually ``static'' on TEST builds or nothing at all, not part of the
> type.
The above actually means that it _is_ part of the type.
> It ought not to be fontified, just as we don't fontify _Noreturn
> or __attribute__ as types.
In 'static char', "static" is part of the type.
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Po Lu, 2023/02/10
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Yuan Fu, 2023/02/12
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Po Lu, 2023/02/12
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/12
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Po Lu, 2023/02/12
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/12
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Po Lu, 2023/02/12
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Po Lu, 2023/02/12
- bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/12