[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: portability of 'printf' command
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: portability of 'printf' command |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:06:12 -0600 (CST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Thomas Dickey wrote:
I am not able to find any. However, the behavior of printf surely changes
over time as standards move forward.
SunOS didn't have one (I don't see it in the manpages, at any rate).
I did check SunOS 5.6 (Solaris 2.6) and it does have one. SunOS 4
probably didn't have printf.
Even those of us with failing memories will recall that on some
systems (probably including older Solaris), the printf was liable to
drop core at the slightest inclination.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Ben Pfaff, 2010/02/20
- Re: [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Bruno Haible, 2010/02/20
- Re: [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Ben Pfaff, 2010/02/20
- Re: [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Eric Blake, 2010/02/20
- Re: [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Bruno Haible, 2010/02/20
- Re: [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Ben Pfaff, 2010/02/21
- Re: [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Bruno Haible, 2010/02/21
- portability of 'printf' command, Bruno Haible, 2010/02/21
- Re: portability of 'printf' command, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/02/21
- Re: portability of 'printf' command, Thomas Dickey, 2010/02/22
- Re: portability of 'printf' command,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: portability of 'printf' command, Thomas Dickey, 2010/02/22
- Re: portability of 'printf' command, Ben Pfaff, 2010/02/21
- Re: [patch] fix "broken pipe" message from lseek test, Eric Blake, 2010/02/22