[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Openat without die
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Openat without die |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:09:47 +0100 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 01/11/11 12:38, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> That looks fine. Thanks!
>
> OK, thanks, on further inspection I found one problem with it:
> save-cwd needs to depend on getcwd, for portability to hosts
> with inadequate getcwd implementations. So I pushed
> this slightly-different patch with that in mind.
Oooh. Yes, the getcwd dependency is definitely required.
Glad you caught that.
- Re: Openat without die, (continued)
- Re: Openat without die, Eric Blake, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Eric Blake, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Eric Blake, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Eric Blake, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: Openat without die, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/11
- Message not available
- ChangeLog fix for openat-die fix, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/12
- Re: Openat without die, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/01/12
- Re: Openat without die, Eric Blake, 2011/01/12
- Re: Openat without die, Bruno Haible, 2011/01/11
- Re: Openat without die, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/13
Re: Openat without die, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/11